theorymarx
 
Marxism

Marxism

Social theory

 

                                                   

Having discussed the basic elements of Marxist theory you maybe thinking that Marx’s utopian society of Communism is fab but then you may at the same time be reading articles of Communist/Socialist countries and be thinking that is not what I’ve been taught about Marxism!

 

Current Communist countries

Media Articles

Cuba

Cuba years

Why the US fears Cuba

Laos

Lazy, hazy, crazy Laos

On deadly ground

North Korea

The madness of Kim Jong Il (part two)

Vietnam

Pham Van Dong

 

 

In Modern societies the word ‘communism’ has become distorted from the original ideals set down in the 1848 “Communist Manifesto” by Karl Marx & Fredrich Engels. It has now become synonymous with countries that have taken that name especially the Soviet Union (the trendy CCCP word on your t-shirts), Eastern European and the existing countries in the table above.  These countries were and are if you read the articles an assortment of dictorships based on merciless, cold-blooded and centrally bureaucratized economies.

 

The following is an extract form the Socialist Party’s website click on the link below to read more.

 


Lenin and Trotsky, the leaders of the Russian Revolution of October 1917, always explained that socialism "requires the joint efforts of workers in a number of advanced countries," meaning Western Europe, while Russia was a backward, feudal society. It was not an advanced capitalist economy, where the processes described in the Manifesto had prepared the ground for a successful transformation into a socialist society.

In the Preface to the Russian Edition of the Communist Manifesto, in 1882, Marx and Engels acknowledged that (at that time) more than half the land of Russia was "owned in common by the peasants." Was Russia fated to emulate the West and go through a capitalist development before it could turn to socialism?

"The only answer to that possible today is this: If the Russian Revolution becomes the signal for a proletarian revolution in the West, so that both complement each other, the present Russian common ownership of land may serve as the starting point for a communist development." (1882 Preface to Russian edition of the Communist Manifesto)

This was in outline the outlook of Lenin and Trotsky. The Russian Revolution of 1917 inspired revolutions and uprisings throughout Europe, including in Germany in 1918, 1919 and 1923. But with poor leadership, they failed to overthrow capitalism. As explained in "What About Russia?" the continued isolation of the revolution in the economically backward territories of the Soviet Union led to the inevitable overthrow of the genuine socialist ideals of the Russian revolution. The leaders of the Bolshevik Party, at the time of the Russian Revolution, all stated that

…without a revolution in the West, Bolshevism will be liquidated either by internal counterrevolution or by external intervention, or by a combination of both. Lenin stressed again and again that the bureaucratisation of the Soviet regime was not a technical or organizational question, but the potential beginning of the degeneration of the workers' state. (Trotsky, Stalinism and Bolshevism)

Capitalism and Landlordism was subsequently overthrown in several other countries throughout the world, such as China and Cuba. But these countries were also mainly peasant based, and established regimes following the model of the Soviet Union under Stalin. None of the regimes which are called Communist represent the true aspirations of the Communist Manifesto.

Today the Socialist Party uses the word "socialist" rather than communist, to avoid any confusion with Stalinist regimes or Stalinist ideology.

In the Preface to the English edition of the Manifesto of 1888, Engels explains that when the Manifesto was first published, the word "socialist" meant "utopians" and "quacks", whereas those workers who wanted "a total social change," called themselves "Communists". But by the time Engels wrote the preface to the German edition of 1872, he could declare that the Manifesto had become an "historical document which we have no right to alter."

The Manifesto’s "vision of the Global Market was uncannily prescient," remarks Francis Wheen, in his biography of Marx. (Karl Marx, published in 1999 by Fourth Estate, London, p122.) Marx and Engels provided socialists with an understanding of how the processes of global capitalism lead to the wars, the ruination of nations, and the starvation of millions today. Remarking on the collapse of the stock markets, the fall of the high-tech sector, and the spread of recession over the last few years, Larry Elliott commented in The Guardian

"The Marxist interpretation of globalisation may yet be proved right. Its analysis of the events of the last few years has tended to be more coherent than the Panglossian guff emanating from those who believe that the world economy has never been in better shape." (2 July 2001.)

Yet the Manifesto was written when modern capitalism and the working class were in their infancy – in Germany, for instance, the working class comprised less than 5% of the population. It is truly remarkable that over 150 years after the Manifesto was published, Marx was voted "Thinker of the Millennium" by a "clear margin" in a BBC online poll in October 1999..”

 

Socialist Party Website

 

Last updated  2008/09/28 09:24:33 BSTHits  1508