| |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
| |
Benchmark: quality of this work in relation to your past work and my expectations of what you should be able to do. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Creativity: degree to which you show ability to solve the problems the assignment presents; includes originality and honors risks to try different approaches to solve problems. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Visuals/Aids: this refers to the use and quality of any presentation aids you use. Does not assume you must have a visual or multimedia aid to present successfully; this is meant to assess the extent to which your aids, if you have any, are effectively created and used in your presentation. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
On task: the degree to which team members followed all the steps of the task. The degree to which conversation in the group was related to the task. The degree to which the team managed its time effectively to complete the task punctually. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Collaboration: the degree to which each member of the group contributed to the work and expected each member to contribute to the work. Not based on one person’s ideas or work. The degree to which each team member participates in the presentation. The degree to which team members listen to other teammates, help each other to reach plausible conclusions, fulfill their roles and duties, and share information with each other. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Process: another word for this is preparation: to what extent does your presentation suggest you prepared your materials and speech for this presentation; or does it look like you are making it up as you go along. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Insight: the degree to which your work shows insight into the subject at hand. This is different from knowledge/expertise; if they deal with the what/who, insight deals with the why/how/so? Insight also reveals close reading of text, accurate analysis of the evidence, synthesis of ideas, and the derivation of conclusions based on close reading and analysis. Insight sheds light on the topic and reveals truths that are not obvious. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Academic Rigor: the degree to which members challenged each other AND members of other teams (during their presentations) regarding misinterpretations of the text, unsubstantiated assertions, assertions based on part of the text and not the entire work, unpreparedness, incompleteness, or faulty thinking. The degree of accurate, specific, and thorough evidence on which interpretations and assertions are based. The degree to which team members reveal that they have read and understood the text. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Knowledge/Expertise: reflects the overall fluency of your knowledge regarding your subject. This is measured by what you say and how you are able to answer people's questions; also by the extent to which specific evidence and details reveal the depth of your understanding of the subject and the text. If appropriate, evaluates the quality and effective use of examples to support and illustrate. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
| |
Delivery: includes eye contact, projection of voice, stage presence, clarity of speech. | | Excellent | | | | | | Poor | | |
