Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

Intro to Phil

AB
Emotivismmoral propositions make no claims about reality but, rather, merely express the approval and disapproval of the speaker
Relativism (subjectivism)denial of any absolute or objective moral values, and the affirmation of the individual as the source of morality
Absolutism (objectivism)moral values are independent of human opinion and have a common or universal application
Cultural relativismmorality and other values are rooted in the experience, habits, and preferences of a culture
Relativism as impracticalpeople don’t actually live as relativists, just say they are (we impose our morality on others)
Existentialismphilosophical perspective which disdains abstractions and focuses on the concrete reality and freedom of the existing individual
Existence precedes essencewhat is first given is the existence of a particular thing; only after that does its essence appear
Subjectivityin existentialism, the concretely existing individual as the point of departure for authentic philosophizing
Determinismview that everything that comes into being is caused in such a way that it could not have been otherwise
Hard-determinismview that the will is determined ultimately by factors beyond the responsibility of the individual
Soft-determinismview that the will is determined by the character of the individual, and thus individuals are responsible for their choices
Indeterminismview that some things, and therefore possibly the will, are free of causal determination
Teleological ethicsview that emphasizes the results of actions as the test of their rightness
Deontological ethicsview that emphasizes the performance of duty, rather than results, as the sign of right action
Hedonismethical doctrine that pleasure is the highest good, and the production of pleasure is the criterion of right action
Pleasure principle (j.j.)pleasure is the criterion or standard or payoff of right action
Egoismliterally, “I-ism,” the emphasis on the self as the ultimate reality, central concern, etc…
Psychological egoismthe belief that everyone by nature seeks his or her self-interest
Ethical egoism (hedonic egoism)egoism + hedonism
Naturalistic ethicstheories of moral obligations based on and derived from nature, including human nature
Factual judgmentjudgment which describes some empirical state of affairs
Value Judgmentjudgment which evaluates something or judges its worth
Altruismbelief that everyone ought as much as possible to seek the good of others
Principle of utilityusefulness or that which promoted the greatest balance of good over evil
Benevolence principlehappiness is to be distributed as widely and as equally as possible among all people
Utalitarianism as social hedonismethical doctrine that an action is right if, and only if, it promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people
Utalitarianism as political positionit’s a democratic point of view
Bentham’s version of Utalitarianismquantity over quality
Mill’s version of Utalitarianismquality over quantity
Principle of utility as unprovablequestions of ultimate ends to not admit of proof
Principle of utility as provable (Mill’s Proof)it is possible to produce that anything is desirable if people do actually desire it
Mill’s criterion of the best pleasuresquality is more important that quantity
Mill’s internal sanctiona motivation lying within us (feeling or conscience) for behavior of a certain kind
Intentionwhat the agent wills to do
Motivefeeling which makes him will so to do
Act-utalitarianismethical theory that emphasizes particular actions to be taken in particular situations to bring about the greatest benefit
Rule-utaltitarismethical theory which emphasizes rules to be followed in a situation to bring about the greatest benefit
Justice principlehappiness is to be distributed among a many people as possible
Naturalistic fallacy (Hume’s Is/Ought argument)mistake of equating a factual judgment with a value judgment, or confusing a natural property (pleasure) with a nonnatural property (good)
Kant’s rejection of teleological ethicsteleological ethics are based on what happens to be, might be, or could be, instead of matter of necessity and universality
Good will, as basis of morality: intention to act in accordance with moral law; or nothing in the world can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will
Categorical imperative(Kant) principle of moral conduct: “act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”; more generally, a moral command with no “ifs” or “buts”
Hypothteticalcommands you to do X if you wanted Y
Categoricalcommands you to do X inasmuch as X is intrinsically right, that is, right in and of itself, aside from any other considerations
3 versions of the Categorical imperative1.act only according to that maxi by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law 2.act only so that the will through its maxims could regard itself at the same time as making universal laws 3.act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only

This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities