End of the Unit Evaluation for Vitals Unit on Maribeth Blankenheim - Fall 2007

Name


  1. Instructor demonstrated advanced planning for the unit.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor demonstrated advanced planning for daily meetings.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor explained objectives and grading procedures.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor used texts and other materials appropriate to the objectives.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor used examples to support instructional content.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor was enthusiastic.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor made suggestions for improved ways to perform procedures.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor used various instructional methods to accomplish objectives.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor covered the unit learning objectives.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor creates an environment conducive to learning.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor used class time effectively.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. The course is set up with appropriate class time for instruction and check offs.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor met with the class according to the posted schedule.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor was fair.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor was available outside of class.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor provided assistance when needed.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor was open to discussion and comments.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor is patient and offers encouragement.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Tests, quizzes, check offs and projects measured learning of the material.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor graded all tests, quizzes, check offs and projects fairly and in a timely manner.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor returned all tests, quizzes, check offs and projects in a timely manner.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Instructor informed students of their progress and current grade.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Time for demonstration and practice of procedural skills is sufficient.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. The size of the practice labs is conducive to the learning process.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Time for checking off procedural skills is sufficient.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. Open lab scheduled for practice and procedural check offs is beneficial to the learning process.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly disagree  Strongly agree


  1. What teaching method was most beneficial to you in this unit?


  1. What teaching method was least beneficial to you in this unit?


  1. Please make any other comments or suggestions about this unit.





Michelle Bjornstad