Lunch & Learn Feedback: Brand Engagement - November 29, 2007 - Montreal

Your feedback is important to us. Please tell us what you think about the Brand Engagement session you have just received.

Please tell us what we are doing well and what can be improved upon. For areas of improvement, specific examples are appreciated because they help to better understand your concerns. All feedback will be received anonymously.

Please complete this assessment by Friday, December 7, 2007. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me or send an email.

Thank you, Samantha Woitzik - 416-552-2155.



  1. COURSE CONTENT:

    Please select the rating that reflects your overall evaluation of the Training session:

            1 2 3 4 5      
      The session contained relevant information for me & my role. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree  
      The visual aids were well designed & supported the session content. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree  
      The pace of the session was just right. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree  
      There was adequate learning activities to reinforce the training content. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree  



  1. Please rate how comfortable you are in performing the following tasks:

            1 2 3 4 5      
      Defining Brand Engagement Not Comfortable Very Comfortable  
      Explaining how the Brand Engagement strategy was developed Not Comfortable Very Comfortable  
      Applying the Brand Engagement strategy to my Sponsors' business Not Comfortable Very Comfortable  


  1. For ratings of 3 or less in Question #1 or #2, please explain:


  1. What did you find most effective about the training?


  1. In your opinion, what can be done to improve the training?


  1. FACILITATORS:

    Mabel Wong

    Please rate Mabel on each of the following areas:

            1 2 3 4 5      
      Knowledge of subject Poor Excellent  
      Presentation skills Poor Excellent  



  1. In what area is Mabel most effective as a facilitator?


  1. How can Mabel improve as a facilitator?


  1. Mihaela Lupas

    Please rate Mihaela on each of the following areas:

            1 2 3 4 5      
      Knowledge of subject Poor Excellent  
      Presentation skills Poor Excellent  



  1. In what area is Mihaela most effective as a facilitator?


  1. How can Mihaela improve as a facilitator?


  1. Milos Vranesevic

    Please rate Milos on each of the following areas:

            1 2 3 4 5      
      Knowledge of subject Poor Excellent  
      Presentation Skills Poor Excellent  



  1. In what area is Milos most effective as a facilitator?


  1. How can Mlos improve as a facilitator?


  1. Additional comments about the session?