 |
 |
 |
ET Human Performance Requirements Review (HPRR) Rating Survey Supervisor / Leadership (FFG)
The HPRR process is the mechanism for the fleet to provide feedback on the adequacy of individual training. This is your opportunity to provide meaningful feedback on the relevance and adequacy of the training you received as an Electronics Technician. The objective is to improve training to more adequately meet the needs of the fleet.
Please take the time to complete this short survey which will be used during this year’s ET HPRR
|
|
|
- I am a/an:
|
- I am currently a/an:
|
- I am in the _______ community/designator:
|
- I am currently assigned to a:
|
- How well do you feel your ETs understand the "Kill Chain" and how they integrate into/support it?
|
- Overall, how well do you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) have prepared your ETs to perform their jobs in the fleet?
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Tech Manuals (Trouble Shooting):
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Tech Manuals (Functional Description):
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Tech Manuals (Parts Support):
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Tech Manuals (Alignments, Corrective Maintenance and
Capabilities/Limitations):
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Maintenance and Logistics Tools (3M, COSAL, APLs, Web-based applications {OneTouch, FIMARS, OneSupply}):
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Schematic diagram reading/utilization for trouble shooting:
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Test Equipment usage:
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Support (power/cooling/air) Systems:
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform Peripheral Systems (gear closely associated with yours – i.e. switchboards, patch panels, crypto, sync amps etc):
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform PMS:
|
- Rank how well you feel technical schools (“A", "C" and “F”) prepared your ETs to use/perform CSOSS:
|
- I expect ETs to troubleshoot down to the component level (2M techs excluded):
|
- I feel my ETs’ ability to troubleshoot down to the component level is:
|
- In my opinion, training ETs received at school included training on electrical/electronic safety precautions and mirrored those practices in place at my command:
|
- I am having difficulty obtaining quotas for locally available (Non-BUPERS controlled) schools:
|
- How does geographic location of schools prevents me from maintaining adequate manning in the following NEC I am required to have (NEC – Title - Remarks):
|
- In your opinion, what fleet requirements exist for which there is no formal training available (which equipment are you regularly asking ETs to maintain/repair for which they have had no formal training)?
|
- In general, what recurring weaknesses do you see with new ETs:
|
- In your opinion, which area/areas need re-enforcement in ET schools?
|
- Additional relevant comments:
|