Evaluation of Cheryl Rogge by her team member

Please use the following rating scale:
5=Outstanding, 4=Better than average, 3=Average, 2=Worse than average, 1=Poor

Name


  1. PREPARATION: How complete were this student's research, reading, and assignments?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. ATTENDANCE: How promptly and frequently did this student participate in the newsgroup?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. PARTICIPATION: How well did this student contribute his/her best academic ability?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS: How positive and productive were this student's interactions, using tact and respect in all communicatons?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. QUALITY OF WORK: What was the overall quality of the work this student submitted to the team newsgroup?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. (Optional)What strengths did this person bring to the team? What did they do well?


  1. (Optional) What would you suggest could be improved to make this person's contribution stronger in a future learning team?





Faculty, University of Phoenix Online
Salt Lake City, UT