Team member's peer evaluation of Debbie Poling

Please use the following rating scale:
5=Outstanding, 4=Better than average, 3=Average, 2=Worse than average, 1=Poor

Name


  1. How well did this student submit thorough and high quality work?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. To what extent did this student take an active and equal role in contributing to team assignments?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. How actively did this student participate in all learning team discussions?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. How promptly did this student submit work, on time as agreed upon?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. How well did this student demonstrate tact and respect when communicating with others?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Outstanding


  1. (Optional)What strengths did this person bring to the team? What did they do well?


  1. (Optional) What would you suggest could be improved to make this person's contribution stronger in a future learning team?





Faculty, University of Phoenix Online
Salt Lake City, UT