TRAINING EVALUATION FORM A - Sheryl Pesigan - 123701 Bulacan PST

Rainmaker Asia values your opinions and thoughts on the course that you have attended. Please take a few moments with this questionnaire to help us determine how this class met your need and to aid us in our future training plans. Rest assured that the information that you supply will remain confidential. Please rate each statement using the following scale: 5 = Excellent 4 = Very Good 3 = Good 2 = Needs Improvement 1 = Poor NA = Not Applicable. Your Name is optional but please ensure to include your batch name or wave number in the name field. (Ex. Juan Dela Cruz/Vonage Wave 20)

Name


A red asterisk (*) indicates required questions.


  1. The training purpose and objectives of the course were clearly identified. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The course content met all the stated objectives.*
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The course was organized and followed a logical sequence. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The audio-visual presentation and training aids used were relevant and effective.
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The pacing and length of the course was just right.*
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The exercises/activities were applicable and relevant to the course objectives. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The course has increased my knowledge and skill level. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. Overall, the training exceeded my needs and expectations. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The trainer clearly communicated and met the course objectives. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The trainer effectively presented the course in a clear and organized manner. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The trainer displayed mastery of the subject matter.*
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The trainer encouraged trainees’ participation in discussions and activities. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The trainer was confident and enthusiastic throughout the session. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The trainer’s response to issues and questions met the need for clarification. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The trainer demonstrated an acceptable professional conduct. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. Overall, the trainer did an effective job.*
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The classroom was comfortable. (i.e. Temp, light, space, sounds) *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The laptop/PC/projector used illustrated clear visuals and presentation. *
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The computer/system functioned properly.*
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. The laboratory was functional and effective.*
     
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    poor  excellent  


  1. What did you like most about the module?*


  1. What do you think might make this module better?*


  1. Which of the topics were the most useful to you?*


  1. Which of the topics did you find least useful?*


  1. Please add any other comments that may help us better improve the module.*