 |
 |
 |
A.C.E. Survey
The following survey will review the elements of the A.C.E – the Adjuster Career Evaluation. This is the tool we use to evaluate adjusters. The survey will include questions regarding the efficacy of both the content of the A.C.E and the process.
|
|
|
The A.C.E. review currently looks at static factors pulled from internal measures. We would like your thoughts on the effectiveness of these scores in evaluating your adjusters.
Select 1 to include the KPI in the A.C.E. or 2 to exclude.*
|
Are there any additional measures we should include that will make the A.C.E. review more effective?
|
The A.C.E. review encourages the manager to look more tacit behavioral factors. There are two professional contact components. Are these still relevant today?
Select 1 for Relevant and 2 for Not Relevant.*
|
Are there any additional conduct elements we should include that will make the A.C.E. review more effective?
|
The Adjuster Career Evaluation promotes a transparent dialogue between management and the adjuster. We have included an option to discuss the adjuster’s career path.
Select 1 for Relevant and 2 for Not Relevant.
*
|
The review begins with the adjuster first doing a self-evaluation, after which the manager is involved and the two discuss. Does this process make sense? *
|
Our OPRS reviews are completed at a specific time every year. The A.C.E. evaluations are completed on the adjusters’ anniversary date. We set it up this way to not overload some branch managers with dozens of reviews. Is this still the best way to complete these? *
|
Do you have any additional thoughts that will make the A.C.E. review more effective?
|