Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

MODULE 4: Defences, Cases on insanity& automatism

AB
AG for NI v BrattyGave us the rules on internal and external factors for Insanity/Automatism
M’Naghten’s CaseGave us the 3 part test for insanity
R v ClarkeInsanity case - tells us that confusion or forgetfulness will not be a "defect of reason"
R v KempInsanity case - tells us that a disease of the mind can be anything that causes a malfunction of the mind(not just mental illnesses)
R v SullivanTells us that epilepsy can be classed as insanity
R v BurgessTells us that sleepwalking can be classed as insanity
R v WindleInsanity case - tells us that D must not know what he is doing or must not know it is wrong
Broom v PerkinsTells us the loss of control or consciousness must be total
R v TTells us that PTSD can be automatism
R v BaileyTells us that automatism must not be self-induced

This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities