Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

Grad Class: Researching Test 2

AB
Critical action researchdemocratic, equitable, liberating, enhancing
Practical action researchEmphasizes more of a "how-to" approach and is less philosophical
Action researchSystematic inquiry conducted by educators to gather information about the ways in which their particular schools operate
Target populationThe population from which the researcher would ideally like to select subjects
Accessible populationThe population from which the researcher can realistically select subjects
Probability samplingPermit the researcher to specify the chance that each member of a defined population will be selected for the sample
Basic steps for samplingIdentify the population, determine the required sample size, and select the sample
Simple random samplingAll individuals in the defined population have an equal chance of selection for the sample
Table of random numbersSelects the sample with each member selected on a purely random basis
Stratified samplingGuarantee desired representation of relevant subgroups within the sample
Proportional statified samplingSubgroups are represented in the sample in the same proportion in whch they exist in the population
Cluster samplingIntact groups are randomly selected for a sample
ClusterIntact group with similar characteristics
Systematic samplingEvery Kth individual is selected from a list
Sampling errorChance variation where the sample will differ significantly from the population on some important variable
Sampling biasSystematic sampling error that is generally the fault of the researcher
Nonprobability samplingThe process of selecting a sample using a technique that does not permit the researcher to specifiy the chance that each member of a population has of being selected for the sample
Convenience samplingProcess of including whoever happens to be available at the time
Purposive samplingSelecting a sample that is believed to be representative of a given population
Quota samplingSelecting a sample based on required, exact numbers of individuals with varying characteristics
Qualitative samplingSelecting a small number of individuals, chosen because they will be good key informants who contribute to the understanding
Intensity samplingSelecting participants who permit study of different levels of the research topic
Homogeneous samplingSelecting participants who are very similar in characteristics
Criterion samplingSelecting all cases that meet some criteria
Snowball samplingSelecting a few people, then using those participants to identify additional participants.
Random purposive samplingSelecting more than needed for the study then a portion of those for the actual study
DataPieces of information
ConstructAn abstraction that cannot be observed directly
VariablePlaceholder that can assume any one of a range of values
InstrumentA tool used to collect data
Measurement scaleSystem for organizing data
Nominal variableTwo or more named categories
Ordinal variableRanking order, intervals between rands are not equal
Interval variableValues are ranked but also represent equal intervals, usually on a bell curve
Ratio variableAll the properties of the other variables and has a true zero point
Dependent variableThe variable hypothesized to depend on or to be caused by another variable
Independent variableThe hypothesized cause of the dependent variable
TestFormal, systematic procedure for gathering information about peoples' cognitive and affective characteristics
Cognitive characteristicMental characteristic related to intellect
Affective characteristicMental characteristic related to emotion
Sandardized testInstrument administered, scored, and interpreted in the same way no matter where or when it is used
AssessmentBroad term that encompasses the entire process of collecting, synthesizing, and interpreting information
MeasurementProcess of quantifying or wscoring performance on an assessment; occurs after data are collected
Performance assessmentType of assessment that emphasizes a student process; i.e. lab demonstration or oral speech
Raw scoreThe number of items a person answered correctly on an assessment
Norm-referenced scoringA student's performance on an assessment is compared to the performance of others
Criterion-referenced scoringAn individual's performance on an assessment is compared to a pre-determined, external standard
Self-referenced scoring approachesMeasuring how an individual student's performance on a single assessment changes over time
Mental Measurements Yearbooks (MMYs)Provides information and reviews of published tests
Cognitive testMeasures intellectual processes
Achievement testMeasures an individual's current proficiency in given areas of knowledge
Diagnostic testYields multiple scores to facilitate identification of a student's weak and strong areas within the subject area
Aptitude testUsed to predict how well an individual is likely to perform in a future situation
Affective testDesigned to measure mental characteristics related to emotion
ValuesDeeply held beliefs
AttitudesIndicate favorable/unfavorable feelings
Attitude scaleMeasures what an individual believes about self, other, activities, institutions, or situations
Likert scaleIndicates the degree to which an individual responds to a statement
Semantic differential scaleAn individual selects a position on a continuum
Rating scaleRespondent ranks a set of statements
Thurstone scaleParticipants select from a list of statements that represent different points of view
Guttman scaleRespondents agree or disagree with a number of statements
Response setThe tendency of an individual to respond in a particular way to a variety of instruments
BiasDistortion of research data that renders the data suspect or invalid
Projective testsRorschach inkblot test
Content validityThe degree to which a test measures an intended content area
Item validityThe test items are relevant to the measurement of the intended content area
Sampling validityHow well the test samples the total content area being tested
Face falidityThe degree to which a test appears to measure what it claims to measure
Criterion-related validityRelating the performance on a test to performance on a second test or other measure
Concurrent validityThe degree to which scores on one test are related to scores on a similar test administered in the same time frame or to some other valid measure available at the same time
Predictive validityThe degree to which a test can predict how well an individual will do in a future situation
PredictorVariable upon which the prediction is based
CriterionPredicted variable
Construct validityReflects the degree to which a test measures an intended hypothetical construct
Consequential validityThe extent to which an instrument creates harmful effects for the user
ReliabilityThe degree to which a test consistently measures whatever it is measuring
Test-retest reliabilityScores obtained at one time are close to the same when the test is readministered some other time
Equivalent-forms reliabilityTwo similar forms of a test produce similar scores
Split-half reliabilityTest is divided into two halves and correlated
Kuder -Richardson and Cronbach's alphaEstimate internal consistence reliability by determining how all items on a test relate to other test items and the test as a whole
Interjudge/inter-rater reliabilityThe consistency of two or more independent scorers
Intrajudge/intra-rater reliabilityThe consistency of one individual's scoring over time
Standard error of measurementAn estimate of how often one can expect errors of a given size in an individual's test score
Survey researchCollecting data to test hypotheses about people's opinions on some topic
SurveyInstrument to collect data describing characteristics of a specific population
Cross-sectional surveyData are collected from selected individuals at a single point in time
Longitudinal surveyData are collected at two or more times for studying the dynamics of a topic over time
Trend surveyAnalyze changes in the attitudes within a particular population over time
Cohort surveyOne population , multiple samples taken, different points in time
Panel surveySame individuals are studied over time
Follow-up surveyAddresses development or change in a previously studied population
QuestionnaireWritten collection of survey questions
InterviewOral, in-person question-and-answer session
Structured itemRespondent selectes from a provided response option
Unstructured itemRespondent has complete freedom of response
Correlational researchCollecting data to determine whether, and to what degree, a relationship exists between two or more quantifiable variables
Common varianceIndicates the extent to which variables vary in a systematic way
Statistical significanceRefers to the probability that the results would have occurred simply due to chance
Relationship studyA researcher attempts to gain insight into variables that are related to a complex variable; helps researchers identify related variables suitable for subsequent examination
Pearson ra measure of correlation that is appropriate when both variables to be correlated are expressed as continuous data; preferred method
Spearman rhoRank data are found in studies with small groups of participants, and are arranged in rank order
AttenuationReduction in correlation coefficients that tends to occur if the measures have low reliability
Prediction studyAn attempt to determine which variables are most highly related to the criterion variable
ShrinkageThe tendency for the prediction to be less accurate for a group other than the one on which it was originally developed
Multiple regression equationA prediction equation including two or more variables that individually predict a criterion, resulting in a more accurate prediction
Intervening variableCannot be directly observed or controlled; Can influence the link between predictor and criterion variables



This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities