Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

BUSINESS LAW TERMS REVIEW

AB
ADMINISTRATIVE LAWRULES AND PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED BY REGULATORY AGENCIES
ALLEGIANCELOYALTY TO ONE'S COUNTRY
CIVIL DISOBEDIENCEAN OPEN PEACEFUL VIOLATION OF A LAW TO PROTEST ITS ALLEGED INJUSTICE
COMMERCIAL LAWCONCERNED WITH BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND THE OPERATION OF BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS
COMMON LAWUNWRITTEN LAW THAT EVOLVES FROM THE CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS OF SOCIETY
CONSTITUTIONA DOCUMENT WHICH SPELLS OUT THE PRINCIPLES BY WHICH A GOVERNMENT RUNS AND FUNDAMENTAL LAWS THAT GOVERN A SOCIETY
EXPATRIATIONTHE ACT OF ABANDONING ONE'S COUNTRY AND GIVING UP CITIZENSHIP
INTERNATIONAL LAWCONCERNED WITH THE CONDUCT OF NATIONS IN THEIR RELATIONS WITH EACH OTHER
JUDICIAL REVIEWTHE RIGHT ESTABLISHED BY MAYBURY VS. MADISON FOR THE COURT SYSTEM TO EXAMINE THE DECISION OF A LOWER COURT, THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, OR THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
LAWSRULES OF CONDUCT ESTABLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF A SOCIETY TO MAINTAIN STABILITY AND JUSTICE IN THAT SOCIETY
LAW OF PRECEDENTWHEN A JUDGE IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW AN EARLIER COURT DECISION WHEN DECIDING A CASE WITH SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES, ALSO CALLED STARE DECISIS
MUICIPALRELATING TO A CITY OR TOWN
ORDINANCESLAWS ENACTED BY LOCAL MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTAL BODIES
STARE DECISIS"LET THE DECISION STAND", ANOTHER NAME FOR LAW OR PRECEDENT OR CASE LAW
STATUTESLAWS ENACTED BY LEGISLATIVE BODIES
SUPREMACYTHE HIGHEST AUTHORITY; US CONSTITUTION HAS SUPREMACY OVER STATE LAWS, STATE LAWS HAVE SUPREMACY OVER LOCAL LAWS
TREASONBETRAYAL OR DISLOYALTY TO ONE'S COUNTRY
UNCONSTITUTIONALA LAW THAT IS NOT AGREEABLE WITH THE CONSTITUTION AND IS NO LONGER VALID
COURT OF RECORDACCURATE, DETAILED REPORT OF WHAT WENT ON AT A TRIAL
CONTEMPT OF COURTACTION THAT HINDERS THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN COURT
ARRESTACTION WHEN A PERSON IS DEPRIVED OF HIS OR HER FREEDOM
PROBATE COURTADMINISTERS WILLS AND ESTATES
GENERAL JURISDICTIONAUTHORITY OF A COURT TO HEAR A WIDE RANGE OF CASES
LIMITED JURISDICTIONAUTHORITY OF A COURT TO HEAR ONLY ONE PARTICULAR TYPE OF CASE
APPELLATE JURISDICTIONAUTHORITY OF COURT TO REVIEW A DECISION OF A LOWER COURT OR ADMINSTRATIVE AGENCY
MUNICIPAL COURTCITY COURT, USUSALLY DIVIDED INTO TRAFFIC AND CRIMINAL DIVISIONS
DUE PROCESS OF LAWCONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT FOR FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS IN OUR LEGAL AND COURT SYSTEM
INTERMEDIATE COURTCOURT BETWEEN THE LOWER COURT AND THE HIGHEST COURT. ALSO CALLED APPELLATE COURT
INJUNCTIONCOURT ORDER ISSUED BY A JUDGE ORDERING A PERSON TO DO OR NOT TO DO SOMETHING
APPELLATE COURTCOURTS THAT HAVE THE AURTHORITY TO HEAR APPEALS AND REVIEW CASES FROM LOWER COURTS
VERDICTDECISION OF THE JURY
PROCEDURAL DEFENSEDEFENSE BASED ON PROBLEMS WITH THE WAY EVIDENCE IS OBTAINED OR THE WAY THE ACCUSED PERSON IS ARRESTED, QUESTIONED, TRIED, OR PUNISHED
REAL DEFENSEDEFENSE THAT MAY BE USED AGAINST A HOLDER IN DUE COURSE FROM COLLECTING ON A NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT
STARE DECISISDOCTRINE THAT REQUIRES LOWER COURTS TO FOLLOW EXISTING CASE LAW IN DECIDING SIMILAR CASES
JUDGMENTFINAL RESULT OF A TRIAL
TRIAL COURTFIRST COURT TO HEAR A DISPUTE
ANSWERFORMAL WRITTEN DOCUMENT THAT ADMITS OR DENIES EACH ALLEGATION OF THECOMPLAINT AND STATES ANY DEFENSES THAT THE DEFENDANT PLANS TO USE
COURTGOVERNMENTAL FORUM THAT ADMINISTERS JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW
PROCEDURAL LAWGROUP OF LAWS THAT DEFINE THE METHODS FOR ENFORCING LEGAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES
DETENTION HEARINGHEARING WHETHER THERE ARE GOOD REASONS FOR KEEPING THE ACCUSED IN CUSTODY AND WHETHER OR NOT THERE ARE SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING THE CASE
DUE PROCESSAN ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY DECISION-MAKING, NOTICE OF CHARGES OR POTENTIAL RULE MAKING COUPLED WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAR, PRESENT EVIDENCE, AND CONFRONT WITNESSES IF WARRANTED
JUVENILESINDIVIDUALS OVER 13 AND UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE WHO HAVE SPECIAL STATUS UNDER THE CRIMINAL LAW
EX PARTE INJUNCTIONINJUNCTION ISSUED BY A JUDGE AFTER HEARING ONLY ONE SIDE OF AN ARGUMENT
GRAND JURYJURY OF INQUIRY. IT IS A GROUP OF CITIZENS CALLED TOGETHER BY A COURT OFFICIAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY ACCUSING CERTAIN PERSONS OF CERTAIN CRIMES
STATUTESLAWS ENACTED BY STATE OR FEDERAL LEGISLATURES
COMPLAINTLEGAL DOCUMENT CONTAINING A SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT OF THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AGAINST THE DEFENDANT
UNRULY CHILDMINOR WHO HAS DONE SOMETHING WHAT WOULD NOT BE A CRIME IF IT WERE DONE BY AN ADULT
DELINQUENT CHILDMINOR, UNDER A CERTAIN AGE (USUALLY 16, 17, OR 18), WHO HAS COMMITTED AN ACT THAT WOULD BE A CRIME IN DONE BY AN ADULT
PUNITIVE DAMAGESMONEY A COURT REQUIRES A DEFENDANT TO PAY IN ORDER TO PUNISH AND MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF THE DEFENDANT
BAILMONEY OR OTHER PROPERTY THAT IS LEFT WITH THE COURT TO ASSURE THE COURT THAT THE PERSON WILL RETURN TO STAND TRIAL
JURYPANEL OF CITIZENS SWORN BY A COURT TO DECIDE ISSUES OF FACT IN COURT CASES
PROSECUTORPARTY THAT ACCUSES THE PERSON OF A CRIME. THE PLAINTIFF
JURSIDICTIONPOWER OF A COURT TO DECIDE A CASE
ORIGINAL JURISDICTIONPOWER TO HEAR THE CASE IN FULL FOR THE FIRST TIME
ARRAIGNMENTPROCEDURE IN WHICH THE ACCUSED IS BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURT, READ THE INDICTMENT OR INFORMATION, AND ASKED TO PLEAD GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY
SMALL CLAIMS COURTSPECIAL COURT INTENDED TO HANDLE SMALL CLAIMS ON DEBTS QUICKLY AND SIMPLY
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONSSTATE LAWS SETTING TIME LIMIT FOR BRINGING A LAWSUIT
JUSTICETITLE OF A JUDGE ON THE STATE SUPREME COURT OR FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
PRECEDENTWHEN A JUDGE IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW AN EARLIER COURT DECISION WHEN DECIDING A CASSE WITH SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES. ALSO CALLED STARE DECISIS
INDICTMENTWRITTEN ACCUSATION ISSUED BY THE GRAND JURY CHARGING THE INDIVIDUAL OR INDIVIDUALS NAMED IN IT WITH A CERTAIN CRIME
MINORYOUNG PERSON WHO HAS NOT REACHED THE AGE OF LEGAL ADULTHOOD. 18 IS NOW GENERALLY ACCEPTED AS THE AGE OF LEGAL ADULTHOOD
ARSONWILLFUL AND MALICIOUS BURNING OF A HOUSE OR OTHER BUILDING
ASSAULTAN ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A BATTERY
BATTERYUNLAWFUL TOUCHING OF ANOTHER PERSON
BRIBERYILLEGALLY PAYING OR GIVING ANYTHING OF VALUE TO PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE THEIR OFFICIAL ACTIVITY
BURGLARYBREAKING (OPENING) AND ENTERING OF A DWELLING HOUSE AT NIGHT WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT A FELONY
COMPUTER CRIMESILLEGALLY USING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE BY COPYING AND/OR TAKING DATA FROM WEBSITES AND PROGRAMS FOR PERSONAL USE WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION
CRIMEAN ACT AGAINST THE PUBLIC GOOD, PUNISHABLE BY A FINE, IMPRISONMENT, OR BOTH
DEATH PENALTYTAKE THE LIFE OF THE CONVICTED BY USE OF VARIOUS MEANS, I.E., LETHAL INJECTION, ELECTRIC CHAIR, GAS MASK
DEFENDANTPERSON ACCUSED OF COMMITTING A CRIME
DEFENSE OF FAMILY MEMBERSPERSON WHO USES FORCE TO RESCUE A FAMILY MEMBER WHO HAS BEEN ATTACKED
EMBEZZLEMENTWRONGFUL TAKING AWAY OF ANOTHER'S PROPERTY BY A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN ENTRUSTED WITH THAT PROPERTY
ENTRAPMENTLAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER INTICES A LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN TO COMMIT A CRIME
EXTORTIONUNJUST TAKING OF MONEY OR A THING OF VALUE BY A PUBLIC OFFICIAL
FELONYMAJOR CRIME PUNISHABLE BY IMPRISONMENT OR DEATH
FINESPAYMENT OF A SPECIFIED AMOUNT OF MONEY AS A PENALTY FOR COMMITTING A CRIME
FORGERYFALSE MAKING OR CHANGING OF A WRITING WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD
IMPRISONMENTINDEFINITE OR INDETERMINATE SENTENCES HANDED DOWN BY THE JUDGE
INSANITYCRIME COMMITTED WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR MENTAL STATE OF THE PERSON
JUVENILEYOUTH UNDER THE LEGAL AGE OF ADULTHOOD
KIDNAPPINGUNLAWFUL REMOVAL OR RESTRAINT OF A PERSON AGAINST THAT PERSON'S WILL
LARCENYUNLAWFUL TAKING AND CARRYING AWAY OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ANOTHER WITH THE INTENT TO DEPRIVE THE OWNER OF IT
MANSLAUGHTERUNLAWFUL KILLING OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING WITHOUT MALICE AFORETHOUGHT
MISDEMEANORSLESS SERIOUS CRIME WITH A LESS SEVERE PENALTY
MURDERUNLAWFUL KILLING OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING WITH MALICE AFORETHOUGHT
PROSECUTORATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE STATE
ROBBERYWRONGFUL TAKING AND CARRYING AWAY OF THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ANOTHER ACCOMPLISHED BY VIOLENCE OR THREATS
SELF-DEFENSEA PERSON HAVING GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE TO BE IN DANGER OF SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH AND USES FORCE TO PROTECT SELF
SENTENCEDECISION OF JUDGE TO IMPOSE APPROPRIATE PUNISHMENT OF A CRIME
SEX OFFENSESSEXUAL ASSAULT BY A FRIEND OR A DATE TO INCLUDE OTHER TYPES OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT
TELECOMMUNICATION LAWS OR CYBER LAWSGOVERNS THE LEGAL ISSUES OF CYBERSPACE
ASSUMPTION OF RISKKNOWING OF RISK AND STILL TAKING THE CHANCE
COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCENEGLIGENCE OF EACH PARTY IS COMPARED
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCEPLAINTIFF HELPS CAUSE HIS OR HER INJURIES
DEFAMATIONINJURING ANOTHER'S REPUTATION
FALSE IMPRISONMENTFALSE ARREST
INTENTIONAL TORTKNOW AND DESIRE THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACT
INVASION OF PRIVACYINTERFERING WITH A PERSON'S RIGHT TO BE LEFT ALONE
LIBELFALSE STATEMENT MADE IN WRITING
NEGLIGENCEFAILURE TO EXERCISE A DEGREE OF CARE THAT A REASONSABLE PERSON WOULD HAVE EXERCISED IN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES
NUISANCEANYTHING THAT INTERFERES WITH THE ENJOYMENT OF LIFE
SLANDERFALSE STATEMENT MADE ORALLY
STRICT LIABILITYPARTICIPATION IN ULTRAHAZARDOUS ACTIVITY
TORTONE PERSON'S INTERFERENCE WITH ANOTHER PERSON'S RIGHTS, EITHER THROUGH INTENT, NEGLIGENCE, OR STRICT LIABILITY
TORTFEASORPERSON WHO COMMITED A TORT
TRESPASSWRONGFUL DAMAGE TO OR INTERFERENCE WITH THE PROPERTY OF ANOTHER
UNINTENTIONAL TORTLACKS THE DETERMINATION OF MIND
ACCEPTANCEUNQUALIFIED WILLINGNESS TO ALONG WITH AN OFFER
ALIENSPEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING IN THIS COUNTRY BUT OWE ALLEGIANCE TO ANOTHER
BENEFITSOMETHING A PARTY WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY ENTITLED TO
BILATERAL MISTAKEMISTAKE BY TWO PARTIES
CAPACITYLEGAL ABILITY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT
CONSIDERATIONEXCHANGE OF THINGS OF VALUE
COUNTEROFFERCHANGING TERMS OF INITIAL OFFER
DETRIMENTANY LOSS SUFFERED
DURESSOVERCOMING A PERSON'S WILL BY FORCE
ECONOMIC DURESSTHREATS TO A PERSON'S BUSINESS
FORBEARANCENOT DOING SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT TO DO
FRAUDDELIBERATE DECEPTION TO SECURE AN UNFAIR GAIN
GENUINE AGREEMENTVALID OFFER MET BY VALID ACCEPTANCE
GRATUITOUSFREE AGREEMENTS
INTERESTFEE OWED TO BORROWER
LEGALITYCONTRACT MUST NOT VIOLATE STATUTES
LICENSELEGAL DOCUMENT GIVING PERMISSION TO DO SOMETHING
MINORNOT REACHED LEGAL AGE OF CAPACITY
MIRROR IMAGE RULEACCEPTANCE MUST NOT CHANGE TERMS OF OFFER
MISREPRESENTATIONUNTRUE STATEMENT OF FACTS
NECESSARIESNECESSITIES
OFFERPROPOSAL OF ONE PARTY TO ANOTHER
PROMISSORY ESTOPPELA PROMISE ENFORCEABLE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION
RATIFYAPPROVE
REJECTIONREFUSAL OF OFFER
RESCINDCANCEL
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTA PROMISE NOT TO COMPETE
REVOCATIONTAKING BACK OFFER
UNCONSCIONABLEGREAT INEQUALITY
UNDUE INFLUENCEUNFAIR PERSUASIVE PRESSURE ON ANOTHER PERSON
UNILATERAL MISTAKEERROR BY ONE OF THE PARTIES
USURYCHARGING MORE THAN MAXIMUM LEGAL INTEREST RATE
ALIENA CORPORATION CHARTERED IN ANOTHER NATION DOING BUSINESS IN THE STATE
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATIONAPPLICATION FORM FROM THE SECRETARY OR STATE'S OFFICE FILED FOR INCORPORATING A BUSINESS
ARTICLES OF PARTNERSHIPA PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT USUALLY EXPRESS (MAY BE WRITTEN OR ORAL)
COMMON STOCKBASIC FORM OF CORPORATE OWNERSHIP PAYABLE TO SHAREHOLDERS AS DIVIDENDS AT PAR OR NO-PAR VALUE
CORPORATIONA LEGAL ENTITY THAT IS TREATED AS AN ARTIFICIAL PERSON BY THE LAW, WITH LIMITED LIABILITY OF OWNERS
CORPORATION BY ESTOPPELCOURTS WILL NOT ALLOW DENIAL OF EXISTENCE OF A CORPORATION WHEN A SITUATION OF SOME PARTY'S WILLINGNESS TO TREAT A PERSON AS A CORPORATION OCCURS
DE FACTO CORPORATIONDOES NOT EXIST IN LAW BUT EXISTS IN FACT
DE JURE CORPORATIONLAWFULLY EXISTS AFTER ALL FORMALITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED
DISSOLUTIONCHANGE IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE OWNERS THAT OCCURS WHEN ONE OWNER STOPS BEING ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUSINESS
DIVIDENDPROFIT PAID THROUGH COMMON STOCK TO THE SHAREHOLDERS, BASED ON THE CORPORATION'S PERFORMANCE
DOMESTICA CORPORATION CHARTERED IN A PARTICULAR STATE
DORMANT PARTNERIS ONE WHO IS NEITHER KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC AS A PARTNER OR ACTIVE IN MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERASSIGNED BY IRS FOR INCOME TAX PURPOSES WHEN EMPLOYEES ARE HIRED
FICTITIOUS NAMEPROPRIETOR USES ANY NAME BUT HIS/HER OWN NAME (MADE UP).
FOREIGNA CORPORATION THAT DOES BUSINESS IN ONE STATE BUT IS CHARTERED IN ANOTHER
GENERAL PARTNERSHIPONE WHICH ALL THE PARTNERS ASSUME FULL LIABILITY FOR DEBTS OF THE FIRM
INCORPORATORSSIGNORS OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
JOINT LIABILITYALL THE OWNERS OF THE BUSINESS MUST BE SUED TOGETHER IN THE EVENT OF A LAWSUIT
JOINT VENTUREPARTNERSHIP IN WHICH ONE OR MORE PERSONS OR FIRMS COMBINE THEIR RESOURCES TO COMPLETE ONE COMPLEX PROJECT
LIQUIDATIONTHE ENDING OF A CORPORATION
MERGERTHE PROCESS BY WHICH ONE CORPORATION BLENDS INTO ANOTHER EXISTING CORPORATION
NONPROFITA CORPORATION ORGANIZED FOR A SOCIAL, CHARITABLE, OR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE
PARTNERSHIP BY ESTOPPELOCCURS BECAUSE SOMEONE DOES OR SAYS SOMETHING THAT LEADS A THIRD PARTY TO BELIEVE THAT A CO-OWNERSHIP EXISTS
PARTNERSHIP BY PROOF OF EXISTENCETHE WAY TWO PEOPLE CONDUCT THEIR BUSINESS TOGETHER
PARTNERSHIP (GENERAL)TWO OR MORE COMPETENT PARTIES COMBINE THEIR MONEY , LABOR AND SKILLS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CARRYING ON A LAWFUL BUSINESS
PERPETUAL LIFEONE MAJOR ADVANTAGE OR CORPORATIONS, WHCIH MEANS THE CORPORATION CAN CONTINUE INDEFINITELY WITH NEW OWNERS
PREFERRED STOCKA TYPE OF STOCK THAT ENTITLES ITS OWNER TO A STATED DIVIDEND
PRIVATEA CORPORATION ESTABLISHED FOR BUSINESS OR CHARITABLE REASONS
PROMOTERPERSON WHO CARRIES OUT THE INCORPORATION PROCESS AND IS PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR CONTRACTS ENTERED INTO BEFORE THE CORPORATION IS FORMED
PUBLICA CORPORATION ESTABLISHED FOR GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES
SECRET PARTNERONE WHO IS NOT KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC AS A PARTNER YET PARTICIPATES IN MANAGEMENT
SHARECERTAIN AMOUNT OF MONEY PAID FOR EACH SINGLE UNIT OF OWNERSHIP OWNED
SHAREHOLDERA PERSON WHO OWNS ONE OR MORE SHARES OF STOCK
SILENT PARTNERONE WHO MAY BE KNOWN TO THE PUBLIC AS A PARTNER BUT TAKES NO ACTIVE PART IN MANAGEMENT
SOLE PROPRIETORSHIPA FORM OF BUSINESS THAT IS OWNED AND OPERATED BY ONE PERSON
TENANCY IN PARTNERSHIPA CO-OWNERSHIP OF PARTNERSHIP PROPERTY
TERMINATIONENDING OF A PARTNERSHIP
UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT (UPA)THE LAW THAT GOVERNS MOST BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS OF TWO OR MORE PERSONS
UNLIMITED LIABILITYBUSINESS OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LOSSES EXPERIENCED BY THE BUSINESS



This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities