| A | B |
|---|
| Griwold v. Connecticut | contraceptives legal, right to privacy exists |
| Roe v. Wade | law against abortions illegal, "liberty" in 14th amendment gives right to privacy which includes abortion |
| Shelley v. Kremer | if state is involved in any way it's state action |
| San Antonio v. Rodriguez | financial discrimination alone not enough for strict scrutiny; don't have to have equal funding for schools--not required to have equal education |
| Bakke v. California | slots for minorities not ok |
| Bollinger v. Michigan | point system for aff action too blunt; plus factor ok |
| Wolf v. Colorado | 4th amendment applies to states, exclusionary rule does not |
| Mapp v. Ohio | 4th amendment meaningless without exclusionary rule |
| U.S. v. Leon | if police really believe they're acting in good faith, evidence can be used |
| Powell v. Alabama | can't be denied counsel anywhere |
| Abington v. Schemp | with religious involvement, 1-purpose must be secular 2-cannot advance or inhibit |
| Lemon v. Kurtzman | with religious involvement, 1-purpose must be secular, 2-cannot advance or inhibit, 3-no excessive entanglement |
| 1-purpose, 2-nature of aid, 3-resulting state/religion relationship | 3 sub prongs of Lemon |
