Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

ConLaw Cases Midterm

AB
Martin v. Hunter's LesseeStory argues that there is a goal to create a uniform, fluid system--and this goal supercedes judge independence in states
U.S. Term Limits v. ThorntonStates can't make up their own qualifications for Congressional office
Gravel v. U.S.Speech or Debate Clause extends immunity to aids, but NOT to outsiders being used as clients (like Beacon Press)
Humphrey's Executor v. U.S.The President's rights to appointment do NOT include agencies that are designed specifically to be free of political or governmental influence
Myers v. U.S.The President can fire and hire at will in executive agencies, because he needs to pick people who will act for him under his direction
Powell v. McCormackBehavior is not a qualification for a seat in Congress; the only qualifications listed are age and residence
South Carolina v. KatzenbachCongress can implement the Voting Rights Act because the 15th ammendment grants them the power to use appropriate legislation to enforce it
Mistretta v. U.S.As long as the legislative purpose is specific, it is ok for Congress to delegate sentencing power to the Sentencing Commission to cut down on limitless arrays of sentences
INS v. ChadhaA bicameral house is a cornerstone of the legislative branch and a one-house veto is not a part of the process
ALA Schecter Poultry Corp v. U.S.National Industrial Recovery Act is an unconstitutional delegation of power because it is not specific enough of a delegation of power
Marbury v. MadisonJudicial Review; Supreme Court can't compel someone from a separate branch to do something (separation of powers)
Hein v. Freedom from Religion FoundationYou can't just argue that you're a taxpayer and your money goes towards something you don't like, AKA it's hurting your, AKA you have standing. No. Doesn't work like that.
Flast v. CohenIn order to get standing with taxes, multi-part test established: taxpayer must establish logical link between their status/legislative enactment; taxpayer must show the enactment exceeds specific constitutional limitations
McCulloch v. MarylandTo perform Constitutional duties, Congress may delegate power when necessary and proper (National bank); states may not tax the federal government on something that is simply a way of carrying out their constitutional duties
U.S. v. ComstockConstitution grants Congress broad authority to enact legislation essential to carrying out their duties (Adam Walsh Child Safety Protection Act is constitutional)
Bush v. GoreStandardless recounts and changing the rules midway through an election is unconstitutional
NY Times v. U.S.Article II gives POTUS emergency inherent power. First amendment does not prohibit censorship. That censorship has to be an imminent threat, material danger though
U.S. v. NixonLegitimate judicial process needs outweigh presidential privilege; the judicial branch says what the law is and can rule on executive privilege
Clinton v. JonesPresidential immunity is for official 'office' use only
McGrain v. DaughteryCongress can investigate to help their legislative purposes
Watkins v. U.S.Q: Does Fifth amm protect individuals from testifying about OTHERS? Decision--No, but in Watkins's case he didn't have enough info--bad process
Barenblatt v. U.S.Fifth amm does NOT protect witness rights to testify about political and religious beliefs (as well as activities) as long as Congress acts pursuant of its powers
Morrison v. OlsonIndependent Council Act not unconstitutional, doesn't increase power of other branches at expense of executive
Arizona Christian School Tutition Org v. WinnTax credit to private school tuition organization is constitutional because plaintiffs do not demonstrate specific issue/can't use their taxpayer status only
Mississippi v. JohnsonSC can't interfere with President's official duties (can't tell him he can't sign a law passed by Congress)



This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities