Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

Con Law Final Cases

AB
States may not issue licenses on goods transported into or out of state. Commerce is not just buying and selling, but trasnportation across state lines for comm purposes. Several states=more than1Gibbons v. Ogden
Just because an item is manufactured with intent to transport does not make it int comm. Manufacturing doesn't have direct effect on int commE.C. Knight
Congress may act pre-emptively to prevent bad practices, business done in the stockyard is an essential part of int comm, Packers and Stockyard Act upheldStafford v. Wallace
The National Industrial Recovery Act, which gives POTUS regulation of hours/wages/ages power is unconst delegation, doesn't est rules, just gives POTUS powerALA Schecter Poultry
Hours, practices, ages are local issues and cannot be regulated. Just because something is made for int comm does not make its production int comm. Coal mining is production, not commerceCarter vs. Carter Coal
Ability of employees to self-organize is crucial part of flow of int. commerce..Natl Labor Relations Act affirmed...Previous rulings saying labor relations not part of flow overturnedNLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel
Production is local but Congress can regulate it if there's a substantial effect on interstate commerceWickard v. Filburn
ONly states may regulate transactions in interstate commerce, and money brought in by treasury may only be redistributed via appropriation, Ag Adj act struck downU.S. v. Butler
Tax is an excise, laid with uniformity throughout U.S., doesn't illegally coerce states, proceeds appropriated normall. Social Security Act upheldStewardt Machine v. Davis
Congress may attach conditions on receipt of federal funds so long as conditions further broad policy objectivesSouth Carolina v. Dole
Racial discrimination places burden on int comm, hotels directly affect int comm (Congress can regulate local activity w/clear burden on int comm)Heart of Atlanta Motel
Gun Free School Zone Act doesn't regulate commerce; only local activities w/direct affect on int comm can be regulated. Congress can regulate int comm channels, instruments/people, activitiesLopez
Gender-motivated crimes aren't economic activity and don't directly affect int comm; logic of Lopez usedMorrison
Medicinal marijuana has substantial affect on int comm; Govt can regulate anything with substantial effect on natl econ...CSA takes precedentGonzales v. Raich
Tenth Amendment places limits on power of Congress to regulate the states as states...states have power to determine wages/hours/etc (Fair Labor Standards Act overturned)National League of Cities v. Usery
States have autonomy but only to the extent that the Constitution has not taken away those powersGarcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Authority
Congress can deal with some local issues but can't compel state legislatures to pursue and pass something. Power to Congress exclusively congressional; states' is states'New York (Hunter) v. U.S.
Tenth Amendment prohibits states from carrying out federal commands.Printz v. U.S.
Federal government has full and complete power to regulate lottery tickets (anything that has substantial effect on IC)Champion v. Ames
Smith Act in PA, which has extra harsh sedition penalties, invalidated by fed law because it's not a local issue and congress occupies that fieldPennsylvania v. Nelson
Price ceiling for warehouse space is acceptable because any business that affects public interestMunn v. Illinois
Law regulated hours/wages of bakers unconstitutional because employers/employees enjoy freedom of contract, and this is an unnecessary/arbitrary interferenceLochner
Oregon law imposing max hours for women is necessary because of burdens of motherhood, performance of maternal functionsMuller



This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities