Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

Social Psychology Chapter 8

AB
GroupTwo or more people who, for longer than a few moments, interact w/ and influence one another and perceive one another as “us”
Co-ActorsCo-participants working individually on a noncompetitive activity
Social Facilitation(1) Original meaning: the tendency of people to perform simple or well-learned tasks better when others are present. (2) Current meaning: the strengthening of dominant (prevalent, likely) responses in the presence of others
The Effects of Social ArousalRobert Zajonc reconciled apparently conflicting findings by proposing that arousal from others’ presence strengthens dominant responses (the correct responses only on easy or well-learned tasks)
Evaluation ApprehensionConcern for how others are evaluating us • Other experiments confirmed Cottrell’s conclusion: The enhancement of dominant responses is strongest when people think they are being evaluated
Social LoafingThe tendency for people to exert less effort when they pool their efforts toward a common goal than when they are individually accountable
Free RidersPeople who benefit from the group but give little in return
DeindividuationLoss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension; occurs in group situations that foster responsiveness to group norms, good or bad
Self-AwarenessA self-conscious state in which attention focuses on oneself. It makes people more sensitive to their own attitudes and dispositions
Group PolarizationGroup-produced enhancement of members’ preexisting tendencies; a strengthening of the members’ average tendencies; a strengthening of the members’ average tendency, not a split w/in the group
Social ComparisonEvaluating one’s opinions and abilities by comparing oneself w/ others
Pluralistic IgnoranceA false impression of what most other people are thinking or feeling, or how they are responding
Groupthink"The mode of thinking that persons engage in when concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive in-group that it tends to override realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action.”—Irving Janis (1971)
Overestimate Their Group's Might and RightAn Illusion of Invulnerability and Unquestioned Belief in the group's morality
An Illusion of InvulnerabilityThe groups Janis studied all developed an excessive optimism that blinded them to warnings of danger
Unquestioned Belief in the Group's MoralityGroup members assume the inherent morality of their group and ignore ethical and moral issues
Group Members also Become Close-MindedRationalization and Stereotyped View of Opponent
RationalizationThe groups discount challenges by collectively justifying their decisions
Stereotyped View of OpponentParticipants in these groupthink tanks consider their enemies too evil to negotiate w/ or too defend weak and unintelligent to defend themselves against the planned initiative
The Group Suffers from Pressure Toward UniformityConformity Pressure, Self-Censorship, Illusion of Unanimity, and Mind Guards
Conformity PressureGroup members rebuffed those who raised doubts about the group’s assumptions and plans, at times not by argument but by personal sarcasm
Self-CensorshipTo avoid uncomfortable disagreements, members withheld or discounted their misgivings
Illusion of UnanimitySelf-Censorship and pressure not to puncture the consensus create an illusion of unanimity. What is more, the apparent consensus confirms the group’s decision. The absence of dissent created an illusion of unanimity
MindguardsSome members protect the group from information that would call into question the effectiveness or morality of its decisions
Social Loafing TheoryLarge groups cause some individuals to free-ride on others’ efforts
Normative Influence TheoryThey cause others to feel apprehensive about voicing oddball ideas
Three Ways to Enhance Group Brainstorming(1)Combine Group and Solitary Brainstorming (2) Have Group Members Interact by Writing (3) Incorporate Electronic Brainstorming
Combine Group and Solitary BrainstormingGroup brainstorming is most productive when it precedes solo brainstorming, individuals’ ideas can continue flowing w/o being impeded by the group context that allows only one person to speak at a time
Have Group Members Interact by WritingGroup priming, w/o being impeded by the one-at-a-time rule, is to have group members write and read, rather than speak and listen. When leaders urge people to generate lots of ideas they generate both more ideas and more good ideas
Incorporate Electronic BrainstormingThere is a potentially more efficient way to avoid the verbal traffic jams of traditional group brainstorming in larger groups: Let individuals produce and read ideas on networked computers
LeadershipThe process by which certain group members motivate and guide the group
Task LeadershipLeadership that organizes work, sets standards, and focuses on goals
Social LeadershipLeadership that builds teamwork, mediates conflict, and offers support
Directive StyleA style that can work well if the leader is bright enough to give good orders. Being goal oriented, such leaders also keep the group’s attention and effort focused on its mission
Democratic StyleA style that delegates authority, welcomes input from team members, and helps prevent groupthink
Transformational LeadershipLeadership that, enabled a leader’s vision and inspiration, exerts significant influence
Transformational LeadersArticulate high standards, inspire people to share their vision, and offer personal attention (Bono & Judge, 2004)



This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities