Java Games: Flashcards, matching, concentration, and word search.

Logical Fallacies Terms / Basic Terms of Argument

Logical Fallacies Terms and the Basic Terms of Argument

AB
strawmanmisrepresenting or oversimplifying an argument to make it easier to attack
false cause / post hoc ergo propter hocpresuming that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other
slippery slopeasserting that if one allows A to happen, then B (and so on) will consequently happen too; therefore, A should not happen
ad hominemattacking one's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument; personal attacks, not attacks on the argument
loaded questionasking a question that has an assumption built into it so that it can't be answered without appearing guilty
bandwagon / ad populumappealing to popularity or the fact that many people do something as an attempted form of validation / If everyone is doing it (thinking it, saying it), it must be right
black-or-white / false dichotomytwo alternatives are presented as the only two possibilities, when in fact more possibilities exist
begging the questiona circular argument in which the conclusion is included in the premise
appeal to naturemaking the argument that because something is "natural" is is therefore valid, justified, inevitable, good, or ideal
appeal to authorityusing the opinion or position of an authority figure, or institution of authority, in place of an actual argument
composition / divisionassuming that what is true about one part of something has to be applied to all, or other, parts of it
anecdotalusing personal experiences or an isolated example instead of a valid argument, especially to dismiss statistics
appeal to emotionmanipulating an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument
personal incredulitysaying that because one finds something difficult to understand that it is therefore not true
burden of proofsaying that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove it
ambiguity / equivocationusing double meanings or ambiguities of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth
no true scotsmanmaking what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of an argument
geneticjudging something good or bad on the basis of where it comes from, or from whom it comes
the texas sharpshootercherry-picking data clusters to suit an argument, or finding a pattern to fit a presumption
middle groundsaying that a compromise, or middle point, between two extremes is the truth or best solution
red herringa fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic
appeal to ignorancethe fallacy that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proved false or that it is false simply because it has not been proved true.
hasty generalizationdrawing a conclusion based on a small sample size, rather than looking at statistics that are much more in line with the typical or average situation.
weak analogywhen a comparison is used to prove or disprove an argument, but the comparison is too dissimilar to be effective, that is, it is unlike the argument more than it is like the argument.
ethosthe credibility of the presenter of the information
pathosemotional arguments
logoslogical arguments
assertiona positive statement or declaration, often without support or reason
claiman assertion
evidencesupport for one's claim
counterargument / objectionan assertion from an opposing viewpoint with evidence


Rockford High School
Rockford, MI

This activity was created by a Quia Web subscriber.
Learn more about Quia
Create your own activities