 |
 |
 |
Chemistry - End of Year Survey - 2026
|
|
|
- Compared to my other high school classes, the pace of learning in chemistry was*
|
- Compared to my other high school classes, the amount of learning that took place in chemistry was*
|
- Of components in this course, rate as #1 the one most helpful to learning with #2 second most helpful, and so on through #5 least helpful.*
|
- Of skills needed to succeed in this course, rate as #1 your greatest strength, #2 your second greatest strength, and so on through #5 being your least.*
|
- Of activities needed to be successful in this chemistry course, rank as #1 the one most challenging, #2 second most, and so on through #5 being least challenging.*
|
- Rank what you think each of these contributed to your success in labs.*
|
- Which of these best describes your reading of daily emails from Mr. Baier?*
|
- Which of these best describe the role of Google Meet in this course?*
|
- As you know, this course doesn't have a dedicated text but rather draws from multiple sources for the information, pictures, graphs, tables, etc. in the archived lessons. How does not having a text affect your learning?*
|
- Which of these best describes Mr. Baier as a teacher?*
|
- Compared to other courses you have had in your high school career, which of these best describes this course.*
|
- Ungraded, open note activities for formative assessment are provided following the vast majority of lessons yet the number of students who use these is less than half the class. Which of these statements best describes your approach to ungraded activities? *
|
- From my perspective, I put a lot more time into producing the open note, ungraded activities to help students understand concepts than what most students did in completing them. What would you suggest to make sure these low stress formative assessments are being utilized by students? *
|
- Which statement best describes your experience learning by the blend of technologies used in the course? *
|
- Please share any insights that you gained from this type of course (blended technologies, live labs, access through multiple communication methods, etc.) that may be helpful in refining the course for future classes.*
|
- In past years, instead of Google Meet, I used Skype and the opening session was projected on a screen or whiteboard with the audio through a sound system. This gave all students who were paying attention an opportunity to see and hear equally. For some reason this year with Google Meet, it wasn't projected but I sent invitations to several students each day so that you could watch individually or in pairs yet few students took advantage of less and usually just depended on Mrs. Greenfield to be the "in between" communicator. Why did so few accept the daily invitation to Google Meet?
|
- Although every lab had a set of instructions for the procedure, these instructions were seldom read and followed and I had to explain the procedure and answer questions that were explained in the printed instructions. The "lab sheet" was available in the morning's email for reading ahead of time and a hard copy was provided at class time. What would make reading the instructions more effective?
|
- Having to explain lab procedures takes a considerable amount of the limited lab time. What would make this part more efficient?
|
- If a video of the lab procedures and skills were available a day prior to the actual lab session, do you think this would eliminate the need for a lot of the time spent explaining things during lab?
|
- This year, most of the labs had a follow up lesson to help complete the lab report and review points of emphasis. Was this the most effective way to provide this information?
|
- The standard class period length is actually too short for many of the labs, especially with the set up required, time it takes to heat things or other procedures and then clean things up and put away. In previous years, we have tried everything from doing the longer labs on Saturday mornings to having extended labs on weekdays when school is not is session, such as a teacher workday. We did these once or twice each quarter. Would this be a possible solution to the time constraints on labs.
|
- Would scheduling some of the labs on Monday mornings before school be a workable solution to some of the time constraints we currently have to deal with when having labs?
|
- In scheduling labs, I always ask about upcoming dates and when there are no conflicts so that everyone can be in the lab. Yet it seems that we still frequently have two or three students absent. Why does this happen?
|
- At one time, I would grade the lab reports and student participation on lab, but with the absenteeism on lab days, this puts some students at a disadvantage. In recent years, I have changed the course so that the day following a lab there is a lesson summarizing what should be on the lab report and an open note, open lab graded assignment over the lab concepts. Which way is better?
|
- The percentage of students using the ungraded, open note activities that are always open and can be used as many times as a student needs to in order to gain mastery is low. To raise the level of use on these activities,
|