QA Leads - Evaluation Survey

To evaluate key components of the QA Leads job

View results without submitting

Name


  1. Ability to multi-task between several projects/tasks
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to proactively ask questions to maintain clear communication regarding mutual expectations and or needs for improvements.
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to listen and express ideas in a positive and effective manner
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to work in an organized manner
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to react to problems in appropriate time
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to assumes responsibility for achieving goals and objectives
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to report progress of testing on a daily basis
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to be flexible during the project/defect releases
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to treat co-workers respectively, be supportive, promote a friendly climate, good morale and co-operation.
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to values others' input and expertise and is willing to learn from others
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Thoroughness of work (quality standards and adherence to internal process and procedures
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Rate the Test case coverage (detailed, clarity, coverage and flow)
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Knowledge of project/defect release requirements
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Rate the timeliness of the Test Case delivery
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to take ownership of tasks/projects and conveys a sense of urgency when appropriate
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Abililty to deliver tasks/project on time under pressure without sacrificing quality
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to pro-actively seek ways to directly address issues rather than always waiting for direction
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to add value by taking action beyond normal expectations


      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to consider potential obstacles and develops contingency plans to overcome identified obstacles
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Ability to exercises common sense and good judgement
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Please provide feedback on what they person did well?


  1. Please provide feedback on what they could do differently?





Toronto