AABC Faculty Evaluation-Mr. Romeo C. Reyes Jr.

Please rate your instructor to the following dimensions. Kindly answer the questionnaire honestly. This evaluation will surely help the school for further improvement in terms of quality teaching.
Rest assured that your file will be highly confidential. Thank you.



A red asterisk (*) indicates required questions.


  1. What are the subject/s he taught. Kindly check all appropriate listings provided*
    Computer Application in Arts and Design
    Advertising Campaign
    Storyboarding


  1. KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT. This refer to the faculty member's scholarship and expertise in his/her field or discipline.*

            1 2 3 4 5      
      Explain the subject matter clearly and with depth without relying on the prescribed reading Excellent  Poor  
      Relates topics under discussion to concept previously learned by the students Excellent  Poor  
      Leads in applying concepts to actual experiences in organization Excellent  Poor  
      Raises problems and issues relevant to the topic/s under discussion Excellent  Poor  
      Integrates topics at the end of the lesson Excellent  Poor  


  1. TEACHING STRATEGIES. This pertains to the faculty member's ability to organize teaching and learning processes to enable students to maximize their potential.*

            1 2 3 4 5      
      Creates teaching strategies that encourage interactive discussion that allows students to discuss organizational experiences Excellent  Poor  
      Utilizes methods which develop creativity and analytic thinking Excellent  Poor  
      Effects wide and enthusiatic class by creating opportunity for extensive contribution of students (ex. break class into teams, partners, or group to perform a task). Excellent  Poor  
      Introduces variety in teaching methodology Excellent  Poor  
      Uses teaching strategies that promote healthy exchange of ideas Excellent  Poor  


  1. MANAGEMENT OF THE LEARNING PROCESS. This refers to the faculty members ability to create and manage a learning conducive environment and at the same time guide, monitor and evaluate students learning.*

            1 2 3 4 5      
      See to it that class discussions are always within the framework of the topic of the day. Excellent  Poor  
      Assumes roles as facilitator, coach, resource person, referee and integrator in drawing student's to contribute to discussion Excellent  Poor  
      Enhances students self-esteem through proper recognition of individuals contribution to discussion Excellent  Poor  
      Provides opportunities for interaction between and among students Excellent  Poor  
      Ensures that students reports are synthesized/critique for relevance, comprehensiveness and up-to-dateness Excellent  Poor  


  1. COMMITMENT. This refer to the faculty members deep sense of responsibility to render service for the development of the students well-being and for the advancement of his/her discipline*

            1 2 3 4 5      
      Makes himslef/herself available to students for consultation beyond official hours Excellent  Poor  
      Assists students in their need and problem (ex. subjects, research papers and other requirements of AABC) Excellent  Poor  
      Demonstrates sensitivity to students' desire to learn to be able to comply with the class requirements Excellent  Poor  
      Shows concern to the student's needs by coordinating with internal and external enabling groups. Excellent  Poor  
      Manifests willingness to help cope with their respective organizations Excellent  Poor  


  1. Comments/Remarks.