 |
|
|
Deallink 1.16 Lessons Learned Survey
|
|
|
- What is your role on the project?
|
- PRODUCT/SERVICE
The product or service of the project met the stated needs of the sponsoring organization.
|
- The objectives for this project were clearly defined.
|
- The objectives and goals outlined in the PAR/Business Case were met.
|
- I am proud of our finished deliverables.
|
- Overall, I am staisfied with this release.
|
- ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT
The organizational change impact was identified and planned for in an effective and timely manner.
|
- The training I received in preparation for the use of the product / service was effective.
|
- The content of the training I received in preparation for the use of the product / service was useful.
|
- Overall, the efforts to prepare me and my organization for the impact of the product or service of the project were effective.
|
- PROJECT TEAM
Overall, the performance of the project manager was effective.
|
- The project team understood the expectations of their specific roles and responsibilities.
|
- The objectives for my work were clearly defined.
|
- My role on the project was clear.
|
- The project sponsor was actively engaged
|
- We had the right skill sets on our team.
|
- All team members and stakeholders were involved at the appropriate time in our project.
|
- I feel the entire team was committed to the project schedule
|
- I feel appreciated, recognized and rewarded for my efforts.
|
- I felt supported by the executives on this project.
|
- What organizational successes or challenges would you like to highlight?
|
- MANAGEMENT OF THE TRIPLE CONTRAINTS (SCOPE, BUDGET, SCHEDULE)
I was satisfied that the ending scope of the project matched what was defined in the project charter.
|
- I was satisfied that with my involvement in the development and/or review of the project scope during project initiation and planning.
|
- The project change management process was properly invoked to manage changes to scope, budget, and schedule.
|
- Changes to scope, budget, or schedule were effectively managed.
|
- As project performance was validated or challenged estimates, the estimates were effectively revised and the current and future tasks were re-scheduled.
|
- The initial project schedule aligns closely with the actual schedule.
|
- The estimated project budget aligns closely with the total actual expenditure.
|
- Project reviews or audits were effective.
|
- The utilization of best practices from prior projects was effective.
|
- RISK & ISSUE MANAGEMENT
Team members were involved in the risk identification and risk management planning process.
|
- The risk management plan was effectively updated or reviewed.
|
- The risk management plan (i.e., did many events occur that were never identified) was comprehensive.
|
- Issues were managed effectively on the project.
|
- Issues were able to be resolved effectively without impacting the project schedule or budget.
|
- COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT
I was satisfied with the kick-off meetings I participated in.
|
- The project team meetings were conducted effectively.
|
- Stakeholders were effectively involved in the project.
|
- Communication with stakeholders was adequate.
|
- The frequency and content of information conveyed to me by the project manager met my expectations.
|
- The project status was communicated throughout my involvement in the project.
|
- Project issues were communicated throughout my involvement in the project.
|
- The project manager was responsive to my questions or comments related to the project.
|
- The project repository was useful and complete.
|
- I felt involved in project decisions.
|
- PROJECT LIFE CYCLE
The needs analysis identified all the project deliverables that eventually had to be built.
|
- How could we have improved our analysis phase?
|
- Our original estimate of the size and effort of our project was accurate.
|
- How could we have improved our estimate of size and effort so that it was more accurate?
|
- Our testing approach accurately represented our target audience.
|
- I had the tools I needed for testing.
|
- The test facilities, equipment, materials, and support people helped to make the test an accurate representation of how the deliverables will be used in the “real world”.
|
- How could we improve our work process for testing deliverables?
|
- Our implementation strategy was accurate and effective.
|
- OVERALL
What is your overall assessment of the outcome of this project?
|
- Were the project goals attained? If not, what changes need to be made to meet goals in the future?
|
- What worked well—or didn’t work well—either for this project or for the project team?
|
- List this project’s three biggest successes. What do you believe contributed to these successes?
|
- What were the most significant issues on this project?
|
- What surprises did the team have to deal with?
|
- What was the most gratifying or professionally satisfying part of this project?
|
- What were the main sources of frustration in the project?
|
- If you could wave a magic wand and change anything about the project, what would you change?
|
- For the next project, how/ what could we improve in the way the project was conducted?
|
- What other questions should we have asked? What other information would you like to provide to us about this project?
|
