Universal Intellectual Standards
Name: 


  1. CLARITY: Was the claim/thesis clearly presented?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. ACCURACY: Was the information accurate?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. PRECISION: How well was the claim supported?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. RELEVANCE: How well were all details related to the claim?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. DEPTH: How well was the complexity of the issue shown?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. BREADTH: Were different opinions/ideas presented, too?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. LOGIC: Was it logical?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. SIGNIFICANCE: How important is this issue?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. FAIRNESS: Was the bias upfront and honest?
    1 2 3 4 5





Ildiko
EN111 and EN112 instructor
BMCC Brimley
MI