2009/2010 Course Evaluation

Name


  1. The instructor demonstrated respect for individual differences (e.g. disabilities, gender, race, religion etc.)
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor told us what we could expect to learn as a result of taking this course.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor set high but attainable expectations for this course.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor provided adequate opportunities for questions and discussion during class time.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. Considering class size, the instructor was available for individual consultation.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor provided useful feedback on my progress in the course.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor graded student work promptly, considering the size of the class, and provided helpful comments and feedback where appropriate.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor’s use of examples and illustrations helped to heighten my interest.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. As the course progressed the instructor showed how each topic fit into the course as a whole.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor conducted class sessions in an organized manner.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. Overall, the instructor’s explanations were clear and understandable.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor explained concepts clearly and understandably.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The instructor’s use of teaching technology (e.g., Quia, audio-visual presentations, PowerPoint presentations, email) was effective and appropriate.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The assignments engaged me in learning.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. The evaluation methods used in this course were fair and appropriate.
      1 2 3 4 5     N/A
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree  


  1. If you are returning to Miramar High School next year, are you planning to take this course as a Tech II or III?
    Yes
    No


  1. Would you recommend this class to other students?
    Yes
    No


  1. What could be done to improve this class for the 2010/2011 school year?





J.P. Taravella High School
Coral Springs, FL