Student and Adviser Post-Conference Evaluation

Thank you for taking the time to complete the evaluation below. Your thoughtful responses will help to improve future Far East Journalism Conferences.

The first several questions ask you to rate various aspects of the conference. After each rating question is a comment box where you can elaborate on any rating, if you wish.

The last questions give you the opportunity to provide free responses on the things you enjoyed most on the conference and what you'd like to see improved.
Name (optional): 


  1. I attended the 2010 Far East Journalism Conference as a
    student.
    adviser.
    chaperone.


  1. To which conference sub-group were you assigned for the week's activities?
    Newspaper
    Yearbook
    Broadcast Journalism


  1. Pre-event Communication was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Pre-event Communication


  1. Yearbook Presentations and Workshops (only answer if you attended these sessions) were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Yearbook Presentations and Workshops


  1. Newspaper Presentations and Workshops (only answer if you attended these sessions) were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Newspaper Presentations and Workshops


  1. Broadcast Journalism Presentations and Workshops (only answer if you attended these sessions) were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Broadcast Journalism Presentations and Workshops


  1. Informal "Pull-Out" sessions (working in smaller groups with professionals and/or advisers on specific skills: JVC700 camera work, extra InDesign sessions, Adobe Bridge, etc.) were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Informal "Pull-Out" sessions


  1. The Meeting Rooms were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on The Meeting Rooms


  1. Availability and use of computers/software to complete conference tasks
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Availability and use of computers/software.


  1. Communication during the event was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Communication during the event


  1. Transportation to and from the event was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Transportation to and from the event


  1. Advisers/Guests Only: the use of tickets for meals at the New Sanno was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Advisers/Guests Only: Optional commentary on the use of tickets for meals at the New Sanno


  1. The Breakfast Buffet at the Opening Ceremony was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on The Breakfast Buffet at the Opening Ceremony


  1. The Opening Ceremony itself was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on The Opening Ceremony itself


  1. The Closing Ceremony was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on The Closing Ceremony


  1. FAST (Find a Story Time) Trips were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Please list places your team visited on FAST trips, and whether or not the destination was a good one (i.e., should it be on future FEJC trip destination lists).


  1. Optional commentary on FAST Trips


  1. The use of "Heterogenous" Student Teams (working on challenges with students from other schools) was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on "Heterogenous" Student Teams


  1. The Team Challenges (making newspaper spreads, yearbook spreads, or the 10 minute broadcast package) were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Please tell us your opinion of the Team Challenge workload (an answer of "2" indicates you thought the workload was just right).
     
      1 2 3  
    Not Enough work  Too much work


  1. Optional commentary on The Team Challenges


  1. Awards (trophies and medals) were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Awards


  1. Lodging/room situation was
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Lodging/Rooms


  1. Conference T-shirts were
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Excellent   Poor


  1. Optional commentary on Conference T-shirts


  1. Please describe at least one thing you were most pleased with at this year's Conference.


  1. Please describe at least one thing you'd recommend that will help make future conferences better.


  1. Any final comments?





Mr. Holladay
English and Yearbook Instructor
Yokota High School
APO, AP