Reproduction Survey

Be honest in judging your peers.

Name


  1. Topic, Dates presented, presenters names eg DarrylH no full names. The rating scale used is 4 for Excellent, 3 for Good, 2 OK and 1 Poor


  1. Subject information?

          1 2 3 4    
      Was the presentation informative?    
      Did it have a clear focus?   
      Was it well researched?   
      Did they cover all outcomes?   


  1. Organization/Clarity.

          1 2 3 4    
      Was it easy to follow?   
      Was there a clear introduction and conclusion?   


  1. Preparation.

          1 2 3 4    
      Had the speaker rehearsed?   
      Was she in control of the sequence, pacing and flow of the presentation?   
      Effective use of notes   


  1. Sensitivity to audience

          1 2 3 4    
      Did the speaker maintain eye contact    
      Did she give you time to take notes as needed?    
      Did she repeat the main ideas more than once?   
      Did s/he make effective use of pauses, gestures, change in pace and pitch?   


  1. Visual aids

          1 2 3 4    
      Did the speaker make effective use of handouts, overheads and/or the blackboard?    
      Were overheads or board writing large enough   


  1. Use of Technolgy

          1 2 3 4    
      Was there a variety of technology used?   
      How well did the technology suit the talks   
      Were they confident in using and showing how the technology was used?   


  1. Presenters and team work

          1 2 3 4    
      Was the workload in presenting shared equally   
      Did all students in the group present?   





Senior Chemistry Teacher
St. Catherines
Sydney