Evaluation of the FY 2003 Performance Review Process - Staff Version

Each year, you are asked by L.A. Care to actively participate in a review of your annual performance. You are expected to use the electronic Performance Guide to offer comments on your performance. You also meet face to face with your supervisor.

Please help us evaluate your experience during the employee performance review period for FY 2003.

Please contact Mark Strunin at x 4133 with any questions.
Name (optional): 


  1. Did you participate in a review of your performance this year?
    Yes
    No


  1. Did you participate in a face to face meeting with your supervisor to review your performance this year?
    Yes
    No


  1. Did you discuss your Performance Guide during the review meeting?
    Yes
    No


  1. Did you and your supervisor discuss actions that could be taken to improve your productivity and performance for next year?
    Yes
    No


  1. Did your supervisor offer you any help, advice or assistance so you could improve your performance next year?
    Yes
    No


  1. How prepared were you for the FY 2003 performance review?
     
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
    Not Prepared  Highly Prepared


  1. What could you have done to be better prepared to participate in the performance review?


  1. How prepared was your supervisor for your FY 2003 performance review?
     
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
    Not Prepared  Highly Prepared


  1. What could your supervisor have done to be better prepared to participate in your performance review discussion?


  1. Please indicate if you used the electronic Performance Guide (PG) for any of the purposes listed below in FY 2003.
    Referred to the PG to know your annual individual goals for FY 2003
    Used the PG to record your comments on your performance at the Mid Year
    Used the PG to record your self-evaluation on your Final Review
    Used the PG to record your responses to your Final Review


  1. The Workflow section of the PG gives you options for sending and returning the PG. Please indicate if you are unclear as to the meaning of any of these workflow instructions.
    Review and return to me
    Revise. See my comments.
    Approve and return to me
    Other. See my comments.
    Send to PG Administrator


  1. Please explain your answer.


  1. Please indicate if you have used any of these "Help" features to aid you when using the Performance Guide.
    On line instructions
    On line description of ratings
    Ability to send the PG to anyone for review
    Ability to look at a PG's audit trail
    Ability to grant access to someone
    Ability to lock/unlock the PG while in the process of entering comments


  1. How effective do you think our performance review process is in identifying your training and development needs?
     
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
    Not Effective  Highly Effective


  1. Do you think that hourly employees should be evaluated on their ability to perform the daily tasks of their jobs, rather than on annual "strategic" goals and objectives?
     
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
    Do Not Agree  Strongly Agree


  1. How "user friendly" is the electronic PG?
     
      1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
    Not User Friendly  Highly User Friendly


  1. Please explain your answer.


  1. What additional features would you like to see available for the electronic PG?


  1. Over the years, L.A. Care has used both numerical scores like 1 to 4 or 5 OR descriptive terms such as "Effective" or "Needs Improvement" to measure employee performance. What is your opinion as to the most effective way to measure employee performance? Why?


  1. Do you find the PG to be an effective tool for managing your performance? Please explain your answer.


  1. If L.A. Care could do only ONE thing to vastly improve the way in which we manage performance here, it would be to...





Mark Strunin