W-2 Case Management - Maintaining Objectivity, Composure and Boundaries - 3.19.2013 Appleton

Appleton, WI
03.19.2012
View results without submitting



  1. The W-2 Case Management: Maintaining Professional Objectivity, Composure and Boundaries course was:
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Excellent


  1. What was your level of knowledge of how professional behavior affects the quality of service in W-2 prior to attending this session?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Low Level  High Level


  1. What is your level of knowledge of how professional behavior affects the quality of service in W-2 after attending this session?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Low Level  High Level


  1. Overall Comments on this course:


  1. The course materials were useful and easy to follow.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The activities, exercises, and examples were realistic and true-to-life.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The delivery of the course (Participant Guide, video, activities) was an effective way for me to learn.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. There was a good balance between presentation and group interaction.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. Comments on Course Content:


  1. The trainer(s) demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The trainer(s) facilitated class discussions and activities effectively.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The trainer(s) answered questions effectively.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. Comments on Trainer(s):


  1. The material covered in the course was relevant to your day-to-day job functions.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The feedback, strategies and other ideas that you received today will be useful to your case management practices when you return to your agency.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. Please give at least one example.


  1. Comments on Relevancy:


  1. Is there anything (method, interaction, etc.) that would have improved the program?
    Yes
    No


  1. If yes, please give specific examples.


  1. Additional comments or suggestions.





CCDET UWO