Improving Employment Search Outcomes Using Focused Strategies UMOS Milwuakee 02.14.14

UMOS
Trainers Sue Brandt and Tony Veeder
02.14.14


  1. The Improving Employment Search Outcomes using Focused Strategies was:
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor  Excellent


  1. What was your level of knowledge of new employment search processes prior to attending this session?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Low level  High Level


  1. What was your level of knowledge of the new employment search processes after attending this session?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Low level  High Level


  1. Overall comments on the course:


  1. The course materials were useful and easy to follow.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. The activities, exercises, and examples were realistic and true-to-life.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. The delivery of the course (Participants Guide, Activities) was an effective way for me to learn.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. There was a good balance between presentation and group interaction.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. Comments on course content:


  1. The trainer(s) demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. The trainer(s) facilitated class discussions and activities effectively.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. The trainer(s) answered questions effectively.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. Comments on Trainer(s)


  1. The material covered in the course was relevant to your day-to-day job functions.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. The feedback, strategies and other ideas that you received today will eb useful to your case management practices when you return to your agency.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Stronlgy Agree


  1. Comments on relevancy:


  1. Is there anything (method, interaction, etc) that would have improved the program?
    Yes
    No


  1. If yes, please give specific examples.


  1. Additional comments or suggestions:





CCDET UWO