Working with W-2 Participants with Learning Disabilities-Chippewa-10.2.14

Chippewa,WI
10.2.14
View results without submitting



  1. The Working with W-2 Participants with learning Disabilities course was:
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Poor   Excellent


  1. What was your level of knowledge regarding working with individuals with Learning Disabilities prior to attending this session?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Low Level  High Level


  1. What is your level of knowledge regarding working with individuals with Learning Disabilities after attending this session?
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    low level  high level


  1. Overall Comments on this course:


  1. The course materials were useful and easy to follow
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The activities, exercises, and examples were realistic and true to life.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The delivery of the course (participant Guide, Powerpoint, DVD, Activities) was an effective way for me to learn.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. There was a good balance between presentation and group interaction.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. Comments on course content:



  1. The trainer(s) demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The trainer(s) facilitated class discussions and activities effectively.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The trainer(s) answered questions effectively.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. Comments on trainer(s)


  1. The material covered in the course was relevant to you day-to-day job functions.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. The feedback, strategies and other ideas that you received to day will be useful to your case management practices when you return to your agency.
     
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly Disagree  Strongly Agree


  1. Please give at least one example.


  1. Comments on relevancy.


  1. Is there anything (method, interactions, etc) that would have improved the program?
    Yes
    No


  1. If yes, please give specific examples.


  1. Additional comments or suggestions:





CCDET UWO