Faculty EOC Review Form

Carrington College is committed to the achievement of outstanding learning environments and programs that lead to excellent outcomes for graduates. Carrington College empowers the faculty to be an integral part of achieving that success via systematic evaluation and use of qualitative and quantitative feedback. Completing this form will help the college and faculty identify improvement opportunities and help us all achieve the best outcomes.


  1. Faculty:


  1. Course Number/Name:


  1. Semester/Year:


  1. Additional faculty who helped teach this class:


  1. Number of students at beginning of semester:


  1. Number of students at end of semester:


  1. GRADE DISTRIBUTION: Please indicate how many A, B, C, D, F


  1. Please evaluate the following in regards to this course:
    1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4: Agree, 5: Strongly Agree

          1 2 3 4 5    
      It incorporates emerging information.   
      The course is sequenced to optimally support learning.   
      The course does not duplicate other courses.   
      The course does not include material better placed in other courses.   
      There does not appear to be any gaps or omissions in this course.   
      The content seem appropriate for students at this level.   
      It is clear how the competencies selected for this course are evaluated.   
      Are the time/effort levels assigned appropriately?   
      The evaluation methods seemed appropriate for this course.    
      The evaluation methods covered the entire content of the course.   


  1. Please evaluate the following in regards to the syllabus for this course:
    1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4: Agree, 5: Strongly Agree

          1 2 3 4 5    
      The syllabus is self-explanatory.    
      Adequate time has been assigned to this course.   
      All major outcomes (Major objectives or Competencies) were included in the syllabus.    
      There were specific objectives for each major outcome (Major Objective or Competency).    
      Major learning outcomes were appropriate for this course    
      Testing dates were included.    
      Student handbook description matches description in Carrington Catalogue.    
      Instructional methods incorporated various teaching methods.    
      Supplemental instruction was provided.    


  1. Reference textbook(s):


  1. Please evaluate the following in regards to the textbook(s) and resources for this course:
    1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4: Agree, 5: Strongly Agree

          1 2 3 4 5    
      The most recent edition(s) of (this) (these) textbooks(s) (was) (were) used.    
      The textbook(s) (was) (were) used to make assignments.    
      The textbook(s) included current concepts and techniques.    
      The textbook(s) included current scientific literature.    
      The textbook(s) included case-based studies.    
      The textbook(s) (was) (were) appropriate for this course.    
      The textbook(s) used were adequate.   
      Appropriate material was recommended for this course.   
      Appropriate supplies were recommended for this course.   


  1. Please list the competencies that were selected for this course:


  1. Please evaluate the following in regards to the how the course objectives were met by the students for this course.
    1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4: Agree, 5: Strongly Agree

          1 2 3 4 5    
      Test questions were related to objectives.   
      Final averages of 70% or higher on exams and/or quizzes indicated proficiency in meeting course objectives    
      Clinical skill evaluations were related to objectives   
      Scores of >80% on lab practicals indicated proficiency in meeting course objectives    
      Lab practicals were related to objectives.    


  1. Please evaluate the following in regards to what was used to make the course content current and relevant.
    1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4: Agree, 5: Strongly Agree

          1 2 3 4 5    
      Case-based studies were utilized in this course   
      Review of current scientific literature was utilized in this course   
      Internet resources were utilized in this course   
      Program Advisory Committee Recommendations   
      Student End of Course surveys   


  1. Please mark your response for your Overall ratings of the following.
    1: Very Poor, 2: Poor, 3: Neutral, 4: Good, 5: Excellent

          1 2 3 4 5    
      Overall course rating.   
      Overall course resource rating.   


  1. Number of students who responded to the End of Course Survey:


  1. Average overall score for Student End of Course surveys:


  1. Average score for Lecture:


  1. Average score for Lab:


  1. Did 100% of student scores average at or above 3.0:


  1. Note any area below a 3.0:


  1. Analysis of student comments:


  1. Recommendations for changes to this course:





Dr. Mills
PTA Program Director
Carrington College Las Vegas
Las Vegas, NV