 |
|
|
State vs. Stallman
Answer the following Questions.
|
|
|
- Identify the Plaintiff(s) in the case
|
- Identify the Defendant(s) in the case
|
- How many times did Stallman drive past the police officer and in what span of time?
|
- How does the city ordinance define "cruising"?
|
- How does the city ordinance define a "traffic control point"?
|
- How does a police officer choose a "traffic control point"?
|
- State the reasons the city council established an "anti-cruising" ordinance around its main streets?
|
- What types of notices did drivers receive regarding the "no cruising" law in Anoka?
|
- Did the notices explain "cruising" to the driver entering a "no cruise" zone?
|
- Did the notice explain to drivers the consequences of traveling past a traffic control point within the five-hour period?
|
- What is "intrastate travel"?
|
- Did the ordinance allow a suspected driver to offer a lawful explanation for why he/she drove past the traffic control points three or more times within the five-hour period?
|
- Why did Stallman believe the "anti-cruising" ordinance was unconstitutional?
|
- YOU BE THE JUDGE!
Having reviewed the case and considered the questions involved, decide the case for either the Plaintiff or the Defendant?
Please explain your decision in detail referencing the law
|
- Did the school’s interest to enforce school policies and adequately discipline its students override the importance of Jeffrey’s privacy in his locker?
|
- Did the student handbook state that the Defendant had an expectation of privacy in his locker?
|
- If you were judging the case would you be in favor of the Plaintiff or Defendant?
|
