Provisional Faculty Reports

This survey is designed to receive your feedback regarding the provisional faculty review process and your interaction with this process.


A red asterisk (*) indicates required questions.

  1. What is your name? *


  1. Have both mentors completed the “observation cycle”? (pre-observation review/overview meeting, observation, post-observation meetings). If so, when?
    September
    October
    November
    December
    We have not yet finished the cycle.


  1. If not, when are they planned?
    September
    October
    November
    December


  1. How successful were those meetings? (5 = Very Successful; 1 = Not Successful)
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. Any feedback on how this cycle could become more meaningful?


  1. Did the dean or supervising manager observe the provisional faculty? If so, when?
    September
    October
    November
    December
    This step has not yet been completed.


  1. If not, when is the observation scheduled?
    October
    November
    December


  1. When is the closing meeting of the mentor team scheduled for each provisional faculty (this meeting includes both mentors, provisional faculty, and supervising manager/dean)?
    October
    November
    December


  1. Were any goals connected to Peer Review included in the provisional faculty member's annual performance management process?
    Yes
    No


  1. If so, which ones and why were they chosen?


  1. If not, why not?


  1. Any suggestions on how to improve the process, better reinforce the need/importance/relevance of Peer Review?


  1. Any issues that need to be addressed with the peer review mentor team? (All answers will remain confidential unless we contact you for permission to disclose).





Curtis Kleinman
Spanish Instructor
Yavapai Community College
Prescott, AZ