- Did you enjoy the task?
|
- Did you find the task challenging at all?
|
- Does the difficulty level of this task need to be increased?
|
- Did the task achieve the goal of teaching the importance of controlling cash?
|
- Would you have preferred a traditional approach to teaching cash control eg exercises and then testing?
|
- Were there enough levels to the cash cycle game?
|
- Was the time length of the cash cycle game too long?
|
- Should teaching of the game aspects, eg receipts/cheques, journals, bank reconciliation all be done at the start as we did?
|
- Did the game highlight the importance of regular banking?
|
- Should the game be continued in a paired or group approach?
|
- Should the experience of QuickBooks remain?
|
- Should QuickBooks be introduced earlier in the term?
|
- Should the use of QuickBooks replace the actual game of trade and recording?
|
- Actively handling documents, journals , bank reconciliation, banking procedures and physically trading with other groups important in understanding how the cash cycle works?
|
- Could the cash cycle work without playing a game?
|
- Specialising job roles really important in the cash cycle game?
|
- Should record keeping understanding be scrapped from the Eman 9 course?
|
- If there was a way of playing the game totally electronically, should we move to it?
|
- Were wild cards introduced, essential to the game?
|
- Should the wild cards be scrapped in the game?
|
- The cash cycle game evolved gradually, was this appropriate for you?
|
- Should every aspect of the game be introduced all at once?
|
- Was understanding of the importance of business cash flow actually gained when playing the game?
|
- Regular feedback was provided in the form of feedback sheets after each trade. Should this continue and did you feel it was important to help you improve as you went along?
|
- Should the game continue to include a MC test as a check for understanding?
|