Aegis Warfare Coordinators' Course

Please complete the enclosed questionnaire and provide an overall assessment of your Officers' level of knowledge and proficiency after completing the ATRC CSO Track II course. Your inputs are important to the development of the Aegis Warfare Coordinator course.
Name (optional): 


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of SPY capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Weapon Control System (WCS) capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Command and Decision (CND) capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Fire Control System (FCS) capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Vertical Launch System (VLS) capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Standard Missiles (SM) capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Aegis Display System (ADS) capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Operational Readiness Test system (ORTS) capabilities and limitations?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Identify Friend or Foe (IFF) interface with the Aegis Weapons System?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of how navigation systems interface with the Aegis Weapons system?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD)?
    1 2 3 4 5   N/A
     


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC)?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of date link interfaces with the Aegis Weapon system?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of proficiency developing threat prioritization matrix?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s level of knowledge of the Engageability slide rule?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s usage of the Engageability slide rule in the weapons' doctrine development and review process?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s understanding of the SPY slide rule?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s usage of the SPY slide rule in the radar doctrine development and review process?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to execute SPY roll-in/roll-out plans?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s employment of the SPY radar in the littorals?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s employment of the SPY radar in a complex or contested electromagnetic environment?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to develop, group, and employ weapons doctrine?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to set and identify discrepancies in the Aegis Weapon System firing train?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to evaluate kill assessments and take appropriate actions to consummate the engagement?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to optimize weapons pairing and manage missile inventory?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how would you rate your Officer’s proficiency to employ and coordinate the watch team's action to defeat a threat?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to operate Aegis Combat systems consoles?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how do you assess your Officer's understanding of their assigned watchstation submode functions?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how do you assess your Officer's ability to use the functions of their assigned submode to complete routine/required watchstander actions?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to recognize subordinate watchstander actions / inactions impact to defeat a threat?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how do you assess your Officer's ability to recognize watchteam cadence and communications breakdown and his ability to take corrective actions?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how do you assess your Officer's level of knowledge of air threat characteristics and profiles?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to recognize and classify an air threat using the Aegis combat system display?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least satisfied and 5 the most satisfied), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to set the Aegis Weapon System firing train?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. On a scale from 1 thru 5 (1 being the least proficient and 5 the most proficient), how would you rate your Officer’s ability to evaluate and mitigate Aegis component casualties in order to maintain the firing train?
    1 2 3 4 5


  1. Have you observed additional tactical knowledge or proficiency gaps not addressed in the survey?


  1. Based on your ATRC training experience, are there any specific topics that you recommend be covered in the Aegis Warfare Coordinator Course?