Criteria for Effective ER&D Presentations

Evaluation survey for the session attended.
Name (optional): 


  1. Presents research concepts accurately
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Makes conections to other ER&D research concepts
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Gives examples of classroom application
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Responds skillfully to both rudimentary and complex questions.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Cites sources when presenting research concepts and ideas
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Organizes the presentation in a coherent sequence.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Plans for effective participant interaction in the instructional/presentation design.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Uses appropriate initial and concluding activities.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Has necessary/supplemental resources readily available.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Plans appropriate amount of material for the allocated time.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Adapts presentation to established goals and the needs of the particular audience.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Builds on participants' prior knowledge and experience.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Creates a non-threatening and non-judgemental learning environment that encourages participation.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Involves the learner in active and engaging learning experiences
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Provides opportunities for participants to process the information and reflect.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Uses a variety of strategies during the presentation.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Uses a variety of resources (clear and meaningful visual, student work samples, and examples of applications)
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Presents in a professional manner.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Employs presentation strategies appropriate to the particular audience
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Paces presentations well.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Provides clear and complete directions for activities.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Uses appropriate questioning techniques.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Gives appropriate feedback.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Uses materials that support and enhance participant learning.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Uses personal professional experiences only to foster understanding of the concepts.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Facilitates reflection at the conclusion of the presentation.
     
      1 2     Need for Improvement
    Observed  Not Observed  


  1. Would you recommend this training to someone else?
      1 2 3 4 5  
    Strongly agree   Strongly disagree


  1. What is the full name of the session being evaluated?





National Youth Center for Entrepreneurship
Errol A. Jones, M.Ed., MBA
Executive Director
Houston, TX